MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Numerical Examination of a Method for Reducing the Temperature of Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Liners

2009· article· en· W2120956767 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandfill Environmental Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Environment
KeywordsGeomembraneHigh-density polyethylenePolyethyleneWaste managementWater coolingService lifeCoolantMunicipal solid wasteEnvironmental scienceHeat transferVolumetric flow rateGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite materialMechanical engineeringMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method to control the increase in landfill liner temperature due to the heat generated by the waste is examined. The design involves installation of an array of cooling pipes beneath the waste. The feasibility of this system for cooling the liner was examined by performing a series of analyses for conditions based on the Tokyo Port Landfill. The results suggest that the introduction of a cooling system can substantially reduce liner temperature and consequently significantly increase the service life of a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane liner in an engineered barrier system. The effects of pipe layout, pipe spacing, and coolant flow rate are examined. It is shown that a periodic pipe layout is the most efficient. Liner temperature decreases with increased coolant transfer flow rate

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it