MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120957161 · doi:10.5589/m08-061

Object-based approaches to change analysis and thematic map update: challenges and limitations

2008· article· en· W2120957161 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Gregory J. McDermid, Julia Linke, Alysha D. Pape, David Laskin, Adam J. McLane, Steven E. Franklin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic mapChange analysisChange detectionObject (grammar)GeographyCartographySpurious relationshipComputer scienceObject basedCover (algebra)Data miningData scienceRemote sensingArtificial intelligencePhysical geographyEngineeringMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstractsmall, spurious polygons created by the inconsistent delineation of persistent change features appearing in consecutive coregistered images. The issue represents a serious methodological challenge that can limit the visual and structural quality of the finished map product if not adequately addressed. A critical analysis of annual land cover maps generated by updating and backdating object-based reference maps in a western Alberta study area revealed that sliver objects made up between 3% and 12% of the total area of change, and between 63% and 72% of the total number of change objects, despite high thematic accuracies. The results highlight the emerging need for a methodological framework designed to handle the spatial challenges posed by change analysis in an object-based environment.des petits polygones parasites créés par la délimitation irrégulière des caractéristiques persistantes du changement apparaissant dans les images consécutives superposées. Cette problématique représente un défi méthodologique sérieux qui peut limiter la qualité visuelle et structurale du produit cartographique fini si elle n'est pas résolue correctement. Une analyse critique des cartes annuelles du couvert générées au moyen de la mise à jour et l'antidatation des cartes de référence obtenues par la méthode orientée objet dans une zone d'étude située dans l'ouest de l'Alberta ont révélé que les objets non désirés sous forme de ruban constituaient entre 3 % et 12 % de la surface totale du changement et entre 63 % et 72 % du nombre total d'objets de changement identifiés par la routine, en dépit des précisions thématiques élevées. Les résultats démontrent la nécessité de mettre au point un cadre méthodologique conçu pour traiter les défis spatiaux posés par l'analyse du changement dans un environnement orienté objet.[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.098 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207