MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120965601 · doi:10.1306/eg100403012

Rapid analysis of organophosphorus pesticides in soils

2003· article· en· W2120965601 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vergel B. Casunran, Stephan B. H. Bach, Dibyendu Sarkar

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Geosciences · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil waterPesticideEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryGeologyChemistrySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical methodology for directly analyzing organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) in solid matrices was devised around a multigram capacity direct insertion probe (DIP) interfaced to a quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS). The DIP-MS system was used to analyze acephate [O,S-dimethyl acetylphosphoramidothioate] and diazinon [O,O-diethyl-O-(2-isopropyl-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinyl)phosphorothioate] in a clean sand matrix, namely, Ottawa sand. Diazinon was also analyzed in a Florida spodosol, Immokalee soil. Instrument detection limit studies demonstrate that the DIP-MS system is capable of detecting 5 g of acephate in the absence of an interfering matrix. The method detection limit for diazinon was calculated at 2.5 g. DIP-MS analysis of diazinon in the Immokalee soil showed as much as a 50% reduction in instrument response compared to the relatively pure Ottawa sand. This was attributable to the dilution effect of codesorbing soil organic matter. Results from the performance evaluation studies using Immokalee soil demonstrate the potential of the DIP-MS technique to directly analyze OPPs and other thermally extractable chemicals in soils and other solid matrices without the need for solvent extraction, sample pretreatment, or confirmation by other analytical methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental GeosciencesSame topicPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyFrench-language works237,207