Uncovering Additional Clues to Galaxy Evolution. II. The Environmental Impact of the Virgo Cluster on the Evolution of Dwarf Irregular Galaxies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The impact of the cluster environment on the evolution of dwarf galaxies is investigated by comparing the properties of a sample of dwarf irregular galaxies (dI's) in the Virgo Cluster with a control sample of nearby ("field") dI's having oxygen abundances derived from [O III] λ4363 measurements and measured distances from resolved stellar constituents. Spectroscopic data are obtained for H II regions in 11 Virgo dI's distributed in the central and outer regions of the cluster. To ensure that oxygen abundances are derived in a homogeneous manner, oxygen abundances for field and Virgo dI's are computed using the bright-line method and compared with abundances directly obtained from [O III] λ4363, where available. They are found to agree to within about 0.2 dex, with no systematic offset. At a given optical luminosity, there is no systematic difference in oxygen abundance between the sample of Virgo dI's and the sample of nearby dI's. However, five of the 11 Virgo dI's exhibit much lower baryonic gas fractions than field dI's at comparable oxygen abundances. Using field dI's as a reference, a gas-deficiency index for dI's is constructed, making it possible quantitatively to identify which galaxies have lost gas. For the Virgo sample, some of the dwarfs are gas-deficient by a factor of 30. The gas deficiency correlates roughly with the X-ray surface brightness of the intracluster gas. Ram pressure stripping can best explain the observed gas-poor dI's in the cluster sample. Together with the lack of significant fading and reddening of the gas-poor dI's compared with gas-normal dI's, these observations suggest that the gas-poor dI's in Virgo have recently encountered the intracluster medium for the first time. Faded remnants of gas-poor dI's in Virgo will resemble bright dwarf elliptical galaxies currently seen in the cluster core.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".