La dévolution en situation ordinaire : étude d’une séance de technologie à l’école primaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le concept de dévolution introduit par Brousseau et Wardfield vise à faire prendre en charge par l’élève son propre apprentissage. Il réfère à une situation didactique très particulière qui relève en fait d’une situation d’échange dual entre un adulte et l’élève. La plupart de ses mises à l’épreuve ultérieures ont été associées à des situations d’ingénierie. Les conditions d’application de la dévolution en situation ordinaire de classe restent ainsi relativement confuses et non élucidées. D’où l’idée d’aller regarder comment des enseignants novices sont susceptibles d’opérationnaliser ce concept dans le contexte normal d’une classe. L’analyse des échanges et des interactions apporte des précisions quant aux conditions d’applicabilité de ce processus en situation naturelle (hors ingénierie) et dans un autre champ disciplinaire que les mathématiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".