Influence of fibre length and filler particle size on pore structure and mechanical strength of filler‐containing paper
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Test sheets were prepared by incorporating softwood pulp with silica filler, PW‐5 (diameter 4.5 μm) or PW‐20 (15 μm). Length‐weighted averages of fibre were 2.5 (uncut fibre) and 1.25 mm (short‐cut fibre). Pore sizes less than 150 urn were measured by mercury porosimeter. Sheets of short‐cut fibres and mixed with uncut fibres at ratio of 3:1 or 1:3 had larger pore volumes than others tested. When filler content increased, the total pore volume increased for PW‐20 sheets, but it did not for PW‐5 sheets with short‐cut fibres. Tensile index and folding endurance were very much affected by fibre length. Contact number on a fibre was calculated by computer simulation, and it had a linear relation with tensile index of sheet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it