MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121063878 · doi:10.1556/aalim.30.2001.4.4

The distribution of iron in iron-enriched cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2001· article· en· W2121063878 on OpenAlexaff
Hélène Gaudreau, Thomas A. Tompkins, Claude P. Champagne

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Alimentaria · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeChemistryDistribution (mathematics)SaccharomycesBiochemistryYeastFood scienceEnvironmental chemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fresh or freeze-dried iron-enriched bakers? yeast (5% of total solids composed of iron) were fractionated, and the distribution of iron was examined. After centrifugation of fresh yeast creams, 89% of total iron was found in the supernatant, which contained only 23% of the total solids. Results suggest that only 13% of the iron is bound to cells in the fresh yeast suspension. Most of the cell-located iron was found on the cell wall, whereas the cytoplasm contained proportionally (iron content of total solids) almost 3 times less iron than the cell walls. Freeze-drying of the iron-enriched yeast had marked effects on the distribution of total solids and iron (in the fractionation procedures that were carried out following their rehydration). The freeze-drying process induced binding of free iron to the yeast cell wall, and twice as much iron was thus found on freeze-dried cells. In the freeze-dried product, it was estimated that 27% of iron was bound to cell fractions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa AlimentariaSame topicPlant Micronutrient Interactions and EffectsFrench-language works237,207