Stimulation of DNA synthesis by tumor promoters in primary rat hepatocytes is not mediated by arachidonic acid metabolites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies in vivo using inhibitors of eicosanoid synthesis suggested that prostaglandins may play a role in mediating tumor promotion in liver by agents such as phenobarbital (PB). However, it is not clear whether any stimulation of arachidonic acid metabolism/prostaglandin formation results directly from the action of tumor promoters on hepatocytes or indirectly from effects of promoters on Kupffer cells or other non-hepatocytes. Our laboratory has been utilizing relatively pure populations of rat hepatocytes under the defined conditions of primary cultures, to investigate growth-stimulatory actions of tumor promoters, an important element in the promotion stage of carcinogenesis. It has been shown that most if not all liver tumor promoters tested stimulate hepatocyte DNA synthesis when added in combination with factors such as EGF, insulin, and glucocorticoid. In the present study, we sought evidence for a role of prostaglandins (PGs) in the direct growth-stimulatory actions of tumor promoters on hepatocytes. PGE(2), PGF(2 alpha), and PGD(2) cause concentration-dependent stimulation of hepatocyte DNA synthesis, while arachidonic acid was without any effect. PGE(2) and PGF(2 alpha) required the presence of dexamethasone to exert significant effects. These PGs did not further augment the stimulatory effect of EGF. In contrast, PGD(2) stimulated DNA synthesis in the presence or absence of insulin, dexamethasone, or EGF. The effect of tumor promoters on arachidonic acid metabolism, as measured by [(3)H]arachidonic acid release and PGE(2) production, was determined. The phorbol ester TPA significantly increased [(3)H]arachidonic acid release as well as PGE(2) formation in hepatocytes in line with known effects in other cell types. However, liver tumor promoters phenobarbital (PB), alpha-hexachlorocycohexane (HCH), 1,1-bis(p-chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethane (DDT), and pregnenolone-16 alpha-carbonitrile (PCN) were without effects. Finally, inhibitors of arachidonic acid metabolism were tested for effects on the ability of TPA or liver tumor promoters to stimulate DNA synthesis by direct action on cultured hepatocytes. In all cases, lack of selective inhibition was observed. Taken together, the results show that while prostaglandins may directly stimulate DNA synthesis in hepatocytes, they are unlikely to mediate the direct growth-stimulatory actions of liver tumor promoters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".