Variations in rifting style and structure of the Scotian margin, Atlantic Canada, from 3D gravity inversion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Regional gravity data and a three-dimensional (3D) inversion approach were used to examine variations in crustal thickness and to extend seismic-based interpretations along the Scotian margin, Atlantic Canada. Constraints on Moho, crust and sedimentary layers were based on seismic refraction models and profiles of deep multichannel seismic data. A subsurface 3D density anomaly distribution was developed, using initial constraints from bathymetric data and seismic basement depth estimates, and inverting for crustal and subcrustal geometries. Predictions from the model include regional maps of Moho structure, crustal thickness and stretching factor. Depth slices allow comparison with seismic interpretations along three transects. The model predictions of variable width of crustal extension and northward thinning of oceanic crust agree with the seismic profiles. The density anomaly model shows significantly greater thinning and numerous block faulting beneath the northern margin and more uniform thinning to the SW. The fairly sharp transition between the two regions may be explained by a transfer zone separating different rifting regimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".