Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partant de la phénoménologie de la perception et de la conception structurale-dynamique des discontinuités géographiques dans les travaux de Gilles Ritchot et de Gaëtan Desmarais sur la forme urbaine, l'article aborde le problème fondamental de la segmentation spatiale et de l'émergence des discontinuités qualitatives dans des espaces substrats. Il montre comment le traitement morphologique des images permet de comprendre les mécanismes d'individuation de domaines spatiaux localisés. Ces mécanismes peuvent être adéquatement modélisés à l'aide de formalismes de type morphodynamique, en particulier les modèles variationnels de segmentation spatiale (Mumford et Shah, 1989) et les modèles multi-échelles régis par des équations de diffusion non-linéaires anisotropes (Malik et Perona, Morel). Des exemples en imagerie géographique sont utilisés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".