Metabolomic Biomarkers in a Model of Asthma Exacerbation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: Airway obstruction in patients with asthma is associated with airway dysfunction and inflammation. Objective measurements including sputum analysis can guide therapy, but this is often not possible in typical clinical settings. Metabolomics is the study of molecules generated by metabolic pathways. We hypothesize that airway dysfunction and inflammation in an animal model of asthma would produce unique patterns of urine metabolites measured by multivariate statistical analysis of high-resolution proton nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H NMR) spectroscopy data. OBJECTIVES: To develop a noninvasive means of monitoring asthma status by metabolomics and urine sampling. METHODS: Five groups of guinea pigs were studied: control, control treated with dexamethasone, sensitized (ovalbumin, administered intraperitoneally), sensitized and challenged (ovalbumin, administered intraperitoneally, plus ovalbumin aerosol), and sensitized-challenged with dexamethasone. Airway hyperreactivity (AHR) to histamine (administered intravenously) and inflammation were measured. Multivariate statistical analysis of NMR spectra based on a library of known urine metabolites was performed by partial least-squares discriminant analysis. In addition, the raw NMR spectra exported as xy-trace data underwent linear discriminant analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Challenged guinea pigs developed AHR and increased inflammation compared with sensitized or control animals. Dexamethasone significantly improved AHR. Using concentration differences in metabolites, partial least-squares discriminant analysis could discriminate challenged animals with 90% accuracy. Using only three or four regions of the NMR spectra, linear discriminant analysis-based classification demonstrated 80-90% separation of the animal groups. CONCLUSIONS: Urine metabolites correlate with airway dysfunction in an asthma model. Urine NMR analysis is a promising, noninvasive technique for monitoring asthma in humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".