MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantitative determination of stress by inversion of speckle interferometer fringe patterns: experimental laboratory tests

2006· article· en· W2121144561 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterferometrySpeckle patternOpticsGeologyStress (linguistics)BoreholeElectronic speckle pattern interferometryInversion (geology)Speckle imagingDeformation (meteorology)Geotechnical engineeringPhysicsSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantitative determination of crustal stress states remains problematic; here we provide a synopsis of work that is leading towards the development of an optical interferometric method that may be applied in boreholes. The major obstacle to the continued development of this technique has been the problem of determining the state of stress within a stressed continuum; we demonstrate the solution of both the technical and analytical issues in this contribution. Specifically, dual beam digital electronic speckle interferometry is used to record the stress-relief displacements induced by the drilling of blind holes into blocks subject to uniaxial compressive stresses. Speckle interferograms are produced at rates near 4 Hz using a local Pearson's correlation method and are stored for analysis. This time-lapse capability is useful when transient effects, such as thermal expansion displacements produced by the heat of drilling or ongoing time-dependent deformation, are active. Four acrylic blocks subject to uniaxial compressions from 3.8 to 5.5 MPa with the compressions oriented at different angles with respect to the axes of the interferometry system were studied. Relative fringe phase information was extracted from appropriate interferograms and inverted to provide a quantitative measure of the 2-D stress field within the block. In general, the largest value of the stress obtained in the inversion agreed with the known stress to better than 70 per cent. These measurements suggest the levels of uncertainty that might be expected by use of such optical interferometric techniques. This technique may show promise for quantitative stress determination in the earth to complement existing techniques. As well, while the interferometric principles are not exactly the same as for the popular satellite-based INSAR techniques, the optical method here has the potential to be useful in analogue physical model laboratory studies of deformation in complex structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it