Biología reproductiva de los cormoranes Imperial (<i>Phalacrocorax atriceps</i>) y Cuello Negro (<i>P. magellanicus</i>) en el Golfo San Jorge, Chubut, Argentina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied the breeding biology of Imperial Cormorant Phalacrocorax atriceps and Rock Shag Phalacrocorax magellanicus at Golfo San Jorge, Argentina, from 1991 to 1993. Dates in which first eggs were observed varied among seasons, being between mid October and mid November for Imperial Cormorants, and between late October and early December for Rock Shags. During 1993, 87% and 86% Imperial Cormorant and Rock Shag pairs, respectively, completed their clutches within four weeks after egg-laying started. The number of eggs per nest recorded one month after the start of egg laying for both species was statistically different among years. The average number of eggs per nest was similar between Imperial Cormorants and Rock Shags during 1993 (2.4 vs. 2.1, respectively) but significantly different during 1991 (1.9 vs. 0.8). During two of the study seasons the volume of the third egg was significantly smaller than the first and second eggs. The average length of the incubation period for Imperial Cormorants was estimated at 27.9 days. Hatching success of Imperial Cormorants was 38.2% (1991) and 52.5% (1992). Chick weight increase and culmen growth showed maximum values during the second and third weeks after hatching, reaching asymptotic values at 60 days. Chick tarsus growth reached maximum values during the first week and asymptotic values at 30 days. During 1993 mean number of chicks fledged per nest was 1.13 for Imperial Cormorants and 0.83 for Rock Shags.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".