MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W212118558 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2005-0034

WRENCH-CLOSURE WORKSPACE OF SIX-DOF PARALLEL MECHANISMS DRIVEN BY 7 CABLES

2005· article· en· W212118558 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marc Gouttefarde, Clément Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWrenchWorkspaceMechanism (biology)Closure (psychology)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Set (abstract data type)Boundary (topology)Class (philosophy)SimulationTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMathematical analysisRobotCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The wrench-closure workspace (WCW) of six-degree-of-freedom (DOF) parallel cable-driven mechanisms is defined as the set of poses of the moving platform of the mechanism for which any external wrench can be balanced by tension forces in the cables. This workspace is fundamental in order to analyze and design parallel cable-driven mechanisms. This paper deals with the class of six-DOF mechanisms driven by seven cables. Two theorems, which provide efficient means to test whether a given pose of the moving platform belongs to the WCW, are proposed. One of these two theorems reveals the nature of the boundary of the constant-orientation cross sections of the WCW. Moreover, some of the possible applications of these theorems are discussed and illustrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207