MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of phage population on the phage-mediated bioluminescent adenylate kinase (AK) assay for detection of bacteria

2001· article· en· W2121198651 on OpenAlexaff
Ying Wu, Lubov Brovko, Mansel W. Griffiths

Bibliographic record

VenueLetters in Applied Microbiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicbioluminescence and chemiluminescence research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacteriaMultiplicity of infectionMicrobiologyEnumerationBioluminescenceSalmonella enteritidisBiologySalmonellaLysisEscherichia coliPopulationVirologyMolecular biologyVirusBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: The effect of phage concentration on the activity of adenylate kinase (AK) released from the cells lysed during infection was investigated in order to optimize a bioluminescent phage-mediated method for bacterial enumeration. METHODS AND RESULTS: The number of bacteria lysed by phages specific to Salmonella enteritidis and E. coli was determined using a bioluminescent method for the detection of AK released. In order to optimize the assay, the effect of phage concentration and time of infection on the amount of AK released was investigated. The release of AK was greatest at a multiplicity of infection (moi) of 10-100. CONCLUSION: The amount of AK released from Salmonella enteritidis and E. coli G2-2 cells by specific phages, SJ2 and AT20, respectively, depended on the type of bacteria, the stage of growth, the nature of phage, moi and time. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: An assay is described which allows detection of E. coli and Salmonella Enteritidis within 2 h at levels of 103 cfu ml-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLetters in Applied MicrobiologySame topicbioluminescence and chemiluminescence researchFrench-language works237,207