MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121221479 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2003.1226362

Step-based facet interactions in wet anisotropic etching

2004· article· en· W2121221479 on OpenAlexaff
Irina Stateikina, Z. Elalamy, L. M. Landsberger, Mojtaba Kahrizi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanowire Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDangling bondEtching (microfabrication)Facet (psychology)Materials scienceAnisotropySiliconIsotropic etchingWork (physics)Condensed matter physicsCrystallographyOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyOpticsChemistryMechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent experimental data has shown that a model of wet anisotropic etching of silicon must not be solely based on the crystal features presented to the etchant. The boundaries of under-etched facets, and step interaction at those boundaries, are also likely to play a role in determining etch rates. This work examines the behaviour of a particular configuration of steps, where both are composed of atoms having two dangling bonds, and where they intersect at an angle of 90/spl deg/, at a junction between two adjacent under etched facets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNanowire Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207