MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121235810 · doi:10.1109/hicss.1995.375502

Embeddings of complete binary trees into star graphs with congestion 1

2002· article· en· W2121235810 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsStar (game theory)Binary treeVertex (graph theory)Upper and lower boundsBinary numberMathematicsDilation (metric space)Binary search treeDiscrete mathematicsGraphArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gives a construction of embeddings of vertex-congestion 1 and dilation 4 of complete binary trees into star graphs. The height of the trees embedded into the n-dimensional star graph S/sub n/ is (n+1)[log/sub 2/ n]-2/sup [log n]+1/+1, which improves the previous result from Bouabdallah and Heydemann (1993, 1994) by more than n/2-1. We then construct embeddings of vertex-congestion 1, dilation at most (5n/4)+2, of complete binary trees into the n-dimensional star graph, whose height differs from the theoretical upper bound of log/sub 2/n! by less than 3[log/sub 2/n]. Our results show that the star networks can efficiently simulate algorithms that are intended for a binary tree architecture.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207