MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121253617 · doi:10.1109/20.877764

Dimensional analysis and constraint propagation systems applied to the design of electromagnetic devices

2000· article· en· W2121253617 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConstraint (computer-aided design)StructuringSet (abstract data type)Local consistencyInterval arithmeticInterval (graph theory)Computational electromagneticsSpace (punctuation)Mathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceConstraint satisfaction problemElectromagnetic fieldMathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper addresses the two issues of whether the specification of a particular device is complete (i.e. a numerical model could be constructed from them) and whether ranges set on particular parameters lead to a physically valid search space. The methods used involve structuring a mathematical model as an equation network providing relationships between parameters. The dimensions of the specifications are checked against the model using dimensional analysis and the effects of ranges are determined by using interval mathematics coupled with constraint propagation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it