Réinsertion sociale : programme d’action pour permettre aux patients psychiatriques d’acquérir des habiletés fonctionnelles et relationnelles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis l'élaboration de nouvelles politiques en matière de santé mentale, un rapprochement avec le milieu communautaire s'amorce pour faciliter le processus de réinsertion sociale des personnes ayant des problèmes psychiatriques. Cet article décrit un projet d'intervention pour favoriser le développement d'habiletés fonctionnelles et relationnelles des malades dans un milieu parahospitalier: les appartements supervisés. L'objectif de cette action est de favoriser chez l'individu une réflexion sur sa situation et surtout lui permettre d'acquérir et d'expérimenter un certain savoir-faire pour s'intégrer dans son milieu. Ce projet d'intervention a été réalisé par le service social psychiatrique de l'hôpital Notre-Dame, département de psychiatrie et Maison l'Échelon Inc., organisme sans but lucratif gérant des groupes d'appartements supervisés pour des patients psychiatriques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".