MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121288943 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.41.4.937

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN Cu CONTENT AND DISTORTION IN THE ATOMIC STRUCTURE OF MELANTERITE FROM THE RICHMOND MINE, IRON MOUNTAIN, CALIFORNIA

2003· article· en· W2121288943 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
R. C. Peterson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDistortion (music)Content (measure theory)GeologyMineralogyGeochemistryMining engineeringMaterials scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La structure cristalline de quatre echantillons synthetiques de melanterite, (Fe,Cu)SO 4 7H 2 O, et de six echantillons naturels de melanterite et un de zinc-melanterite provenant de la mine Richmond, situee a Iron Mountain, en Californie, a ete affinee dans le groupe spatial P2 1 /c. Les resultats montrent que la substitution de Cu au Fe au site M2 cause une deformation de l'octaedre pour donner un polyedre a plan cane. Ce comportement serait du a une distorsion de type Jahn-Teller a cause de l'incorporation des ions Cu 2 + (d 9 ) au site M2. En revanche, l'octaedre Ml ne subit aucune deformation semblable. Les analyses de ces echantillons pour le Fe, Cu and Zn avec une microsonde electronique, par absorption atomique et par plasma avec couplage inductif et spectrometrie de masse (ICP-MS) revelent une variabilite importante en composition chimique de la melanterite provenant de cet endroit, mais sans forte correlation entre les proportions de Cu, Fe et Zn, et la couleur du materiau. La melanterite bleu fonce pourrait facilement passer pour la chalcanthite dans les observations preliminaires sur le terrain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207