First Report of <i>Puccinia canaliculata</i> on Sunflower
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Puccinia canaliculata (Schwein.) Lagerh. is a macrocyclic, heteroecious rust found on Cyperus spp. (sedges) in North and South America, with the aecial stage reported on Asteraceae (1). In July 1997, aecial pustules of unknown etiology were observed on lower leaves of more than 90% of cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) plants at the 6- to 10-leaf stage in a field near Catherine, KS. Individual leaves had one to several large, convex pustules, each measuring 5 to 10 mm in diameter, covering <0.5% of the leaf area. In contrast, the aecial pustules of P. helianthi measure 1 to 2 mm in diameter. Yellow-orange aecial cups occurred on the abaxial leaf surface, with globoid aeciospores averaging 15 × 18.5 μm. Wild common sunflowers (H. annuus) and cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) in the same and two nearby fields had similar pustules. There was a severe infestation of yellow nutsedge (C. esculentus L.) in the sunflower field, but uredia were not found because the nutsedge plants had been killed with glyphosate. Based on the size of aecia, aeciospores, and peridial cells from sunflower and cockelbur (3), the fungus was identified as P. canaliculata. Although sunflower is an alternate host (2), to our knowledge this is the first report of natural infection and is significant because it occurred in a major sunflower production area. Since P. canaliculata is being considered as a bioherbicide for nutsedge control (4), nontarget hosts such as sunflower need to be considered. The possibility of confusing P. xanthii and P. caniculata exists since both rusts occur on cocklebur and sunflower and produce pustules of a similar size. However, since P. xanthii is a microcyclic autoecious rust while P. canaliculata is a full-cycle heteroecious rust, the obvious color difference between the dark telia of P. xanthii and the yellow-orange aecia of P. caniculata should serve to easily differentiate the two species. References: (1) J. C. Arthur. Manual of the Rusts in the United States and Canada. Purdue Research Foundation, Lafayette, IN, 1934. (2) M. B. Callaway et al. Plant Dis. 69:924, 1985. (3) F. D. Kern. Mycologia 11:134, 1919. (4) S. C. Phatak et al. Science. 219:1446, 1983.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".