MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121336427 · doi:10.1109/iembs.1998.745109

Time-frequency representation for classification of the transient myoelectric signal

2002· article· en· W2121336427 on OpenAlexafffund
Kevin Englehart, B. Hudgins, P. Parker, M. Stevenson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceFeature extractionWavelet transformArtificial intelligenceWavelet packet decompositionRepresentation (politics)Time–frequency analysisSIGNAL (programming language)Dimensionality reductionTransient (computer programming)WaveletFeature (linguistics)Signal processingFourier transformSpeech recognitionMathematicsComputer visionDigital signal processingFilter (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An accurate and computationally efficient means of classifying myoelectric signal (MES) patterns has been the subject of considerable research effort in recent years. Effective feature extraction is crucial to reliable classification and, in the quest to improve the accuracy of transient MES pattern classification, many forms of signal representation have been suggested. It is shown that feature sets based upon the short-time Fourier transform, the wavelet transform, and the wavelet packet transform provide an effective representation for classification, provided that they are subject to dimensionality reduction by principal components analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207