MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121399337 · doi:10.3166/qirt.7.73-84

Development of self-reference lock-in thermography and its application to remote nondestructive inspection of fatigue cracks in steel bridges

2010· article· en· W2121399337 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Takahide SAKAGAMI, Yui IZUMI, Naoya Mori, Shiro KUBO

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantitative InfraRed Thermography Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut national de la recherche scientifique
KeywordsThermographyNondestructive testingMaterials scienceThermoelastic dampingStructural engineeringWeldingStress (linguistics)InfraredThermalComposite materialOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new remote nondestructive evaluation technique, based on thermoelastic temperature measurement by the infrared thermography, was developed for evaluation of fatigue cracks propagated from welded joints in steel bridges. Fatigue cracks were detected from localized thermoelastic temperature change at crack tips due to stress singularity under wheel loading from traffics on the bridge. Self-reference lock-in data processing technique was developed for the improvement of signal-to-noise ratio of the thermal images obtained in the crack detection process. In this paper, experimental results of fatigue crack detection by the self-reference lock-in thermography are reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuantitative InfraRed Thermography JournalSame topicThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesFrench-language works237,207