Sensor uncertainty management for an encapsulated logical device architecture: Part I - fusion of uncertain sensor data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A systematic method of integrating high-level decision making and planning systems with low-level sensing, actuation and control is essential for the efficient implementation and maintenance of intelligent industrial automation systems. Additionally, for increased reliability in operation, a system should consider data as uncertain and all decisions should be made using data of an appropriate level of certainty. In this paper the encapsulated logical device (ELD) architecture is presented as an architecture that is modular and scalable. The ELD architecture allows the various agents in the architecture to be implemented in a distributed fashion on multiple hardware and software platforms. Additionally, the ELD contains a fusion mechanism that manages and propagates uncertain data throughout the architecture. Data and knowledge uncertainty is represented in this architecture using uncertainty ellipsoids. Finally, the ELD architecture bridges low-level real-time control with high-level event-driven decision-making and planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it