MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121415728 · doi:10.1109/tsa.2004.840940

Eigenvoice modeling with sparse training data

2005· article· en· W2121415728 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsComputer Research Institute of Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSpeech recognitionTraining setSet (abstract data type)Adaptation (eye)Limit (mathematics)Training (meteorology)Maximum likelihoodCovariance matrixPattern recognition (psychology)Estimation theoryArtificial intelligenceCovarianceSpeaker recognitionAlgorithmMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive an exact solution to the problem of maximum likelihood estimation of the supervector covariance matrix used in extended MAP (or EMAP) speaker adaptation and show how it can be regarded as a new method of eigenvoice estimation. Unlike other approaches to the problem of estimating eigenvoices in situations where speaker-dependent training is not feasible, our method enables us to estimate as many eigenvoices from a given training set as there are training speakers. In the limit as the amount of training data for each speaker tends to infinity, it is equivalent to cluster adaptive training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it