MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121415728 · doi:10.1109/tsa.2004.840940

Eigenvoice modeling with sparse training data

2005· article· en· W2121415728 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Kenny, Gilles Boulianne, Pierre Dumouchel

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsComputer Research Institute of Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSpeech recognitionTraining setSet (abstract data type)Adaptation (eye)Limit (mathematics)Training (meteorology)Maximum likelihoodCovariance matrixPattern recognition (psychology)Estimation theoryArtificial intelligenceCovarianceSpeaker recognitionAlgorithmMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive an exact solution to the problem of maximum likelihood estimation of the supervector covariance matrix used in extended MAP (or EMAP) speaker adaptation and show how it can be regarded as a new method of eigenvoice estimation. Unlike other approaches to the problem of estimating eigenvoices in situations where speaker-dependent training is not feasible, our method enables us to estimate as many eigenvoices from a given training set as there are training speakers. In the limit as the amount of training data for each speaker tends to infinity, it is equivalent to cluster adaptive training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations472
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio ProcessingSame topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207