Efficient Guard Band Based Admission Control in Heterogeneous Wireless Overlay Networks Using Generally Distributed Cell Residence Time
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since there is no single wireless network that can provide high system capacity and cost effective global service coverage for more demanding mobile users, existent heterogeneous wireless networks have to be efficiently integrated for this purpose profiting to an increasing number of multi-mode mobile nodes. Standard guard bandwidth allocation schemes, extensively studied and deployed in homogeneous cellular networks, don't take into account neither mobile node's multi-mode capability nor heterogeneous cells characteristics in future wireless networks. Thus, in our work, we consider a heterogeneous overlay wireless system implementing an extended guard bandwidth with an overflow scheme from various cellular layers and we model various CRTs (cell residence time) using general Gamma distribution that we specialize for each kind of cell taking into account its heterogeneous properties. Furthermore, we designed a fast online heuristic that regularly estimates the optimal guard bandwidth. Presented results, validated by computer simulations, shows that our proposed solution leads to a better wireless bandwidth utilization and a lower blocking rate while maintaining constraints on handoff dropping rates. The quality of these results are the consequence of the model accuracy used to estimate call-level QoS parameters and therefore the optimal guard bandwidth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it