Alterations of the glutathione redox state improve apical meristem structure and somatic embryo quality in white spruce (Picea glauca)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In white spruce, an improvement of somatic embryo number and quality can be achieved through experimental manipulations of the endogenous levels of reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) glutathione. An optimal protocol for embryo production included an initial application of GSH in the maturation medium, followed by replacement with GSSG during the remaining maturation period. Under these conditions, the overall embryo population more than doubled, and the percentage of fully developed embryos increased from 22% to almost 70%. These embryos showed improved post-embryonic growth and conversion frequency. Structural studies revealed remarkable differences between embryo types, especially in storage product deposition pattern and organization of the shoot apical meristem (SAM). Compared with their control counterparts, glutathione-treated embryos accumulated a larger amount of starch during the early stages of development, and more protein and lipid bodies during the second half of development. Differences were also noted in the organization of SAMs. Shoot meristems of control embryos were poorly organized and were characterized by the presence of intercellular spaces, which caused separation of the subapical cells. Glutathione-treated embryos had well-organized meristems composed of tightly packed cells which lack large vacuoles. The improved organization of the shoot apical meristems in treated embryos was ascribed to a lower production of ethylene. Differences in meristem structure between control and treated embryos were also related to the localization pattern of HBK1, a shoot apical meristem 'molecular marker' gene with preferential expression to the meristematic cells of the shoot pole. Expression of this gene, which was localized to the apical cells in control embryos, was extended to the subapical cells of treated embryos. Overall, it appears that meristem integrity and embryo quality are under the direct control of the glutathione redox state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".