Essential Thioredoxin-Dependent Peroxiredoxin System from <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> : Genetic and Kinetic Characterization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori, an oxygen-sensitive microaerophile, contains an alkyl hydroperoxide reductase homologue (AhpC, HP1563) that is more closely related to 2-Cys peroxiredoxins of higher organisms than to most other eubacterial AhpC proteins. Allelic replacement mutagenesis revealed ahpC to be essential, suggesting a critical role for AhpC in defending H. pylori against oxygen toxicity. Characterization of the ahpC promoter region divulged two putative regulatory elements and identified the transcription initiation site, which was mapped to 96 and 94 bp upstream of the initiation codon. No homologue of ahpF, which encodes the dedicated AhpC reductase in most eubacteria, was found in the H. pylori genome. Instead, homologues of Escherichia coli thioredoxin (Trx) reductase (TrxR, HP0825) and Trx (Trx1, HP0824) formed a reductase system for H. pylori AhpC. A second Trx homologue (Trx2, HP1458) was identified but was incapable of AhpC reduction, although Trx2 exhibited disulfide reductase activity with other substrates [insulin and 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid)]. AhpC interactions with each substrate, Trx1 and hydroperoxide, were bimolecular and nonsaturable (infinite V(max) and K(m) values) but rapid enough (at 1 x 10(5) to 2 x 10(5) M(-1) s(-1)) to suggest an important role for AhpC in cellular peroxide metabolism. AhpC also exhibited a wide specificity for hydroperoxide substrates, which, taken together with the above results, suggests a minimal binding site for hydroperoxides composed of little more than the cysteinyl (Cys49) active site. H. pylori AhpC was not reduced by Salmonella typhimurium AhpF and was slightly more active with E. coli TrxR and Trx1 than was S. typhimurium AhpC, demonstrating the specialized catalytic properties of this peroxiredoxin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".