MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121459728

A novel approach to dual and triple-mode pseudo-elliptic filter design

2004· article· en· W2121459728 on OpenAlexaff
S. Amari, Uwe Rosenberg, Jens Børnemann

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Microwave Conference · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassbandDegenerate energy levelsElliptic filterResonatorTransmission (telecommunications)Band-pass filterIdeal (ethics)Filter (signal processing)Pole–zero plotCoupling (piping)PhysicsMode (computer interface)Filter designDual modeResonance (particle physics)Control theory (sociology)Topology (electrical circuits)Prototype filterElectronic engineeringMathematicsOpticsComputer scienceEngineeringTransfer functionTelecommunicationsQuantum mechanicsElectrical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel approach to dual and triple-mode pseudo-elliptic filter design is introduced. Instead of using the degenerate modes of a physical resonator, non-degenerate ones are used instead. All the coupling coefficients are positive (their signs are inconsequential). All intra-cavity couplings are eliminated. Each transmission zero is generated and controlled by a dedicated mode whose resonance frequency coincides with the frequency of the transmission zero. The design is ideal for situations where real transmission zeros are required in the immediate vicinity of the passband. A triple-mode rectangular cavity filter with two transmission zeros is designed, fabricated and measured to demonstrate the validity of the approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Microwave ConferenceSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207