MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121472466 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518318

Relation Between Joint Optimizations for Multiuser MIMO Uplink and Downlink with Imperfect CSI

2008· article· en· W2121472466 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunications linkKarush–Kuhn–Tucker conditionsDuality (order theory)Mathematical optimizationMIMOComputer scienceConstraint (computer-aided design)ImperfectTransmitterTransceiverStrong dualityOptimization problemMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsWirelessDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Joint linear minimum sum mean-squared error (referred to as MSMSE) transmitter and receiver (transceiver) optimization problems are formulated for multiuser MIMO systems under a sum power constraint assuming imperfect channel state information (CSI). Both the uplink and the dual downlink are considered. Based on the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions associated with both problems, a relation between the two problems is discovered, which is termed the uplinkdownlink duality in sum MSE under imperfect CSI. As a result, the MSMSEs in both links are the same and any admissible uplink design satisfying the KKT conditions can be translated for application to the downlink, and vice versa. Simulation results are provided to demonstrate the duality and show the impact of imperfect CSI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207