MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121501174 · doi:10.11575/prism/26294

Geophysical Monitoring Of Salt Remediation

2013· dissertation· en· W2121501174 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental remediationGeophysicsEnvironmental scienceSalt (chemistry)GeologyPetroleum engineeringChemistryContamination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A site near Devon, Alberta was used to monitor salt transport over time and test the effect of irrigation. Direct push EC (PTC) was regressed against coincident chloride concentration measurements from soil cores. The PTC EC data was then converted to chloride measurements. Using the EM-31 instrument, two site-wide surveys were taken in 2008 and 2010 and both were regressed against coincident PTC EC data converted to chloride. The EM-31 survey was converted to chloride using the regression relationship. Salt mass was determined by kriging with a locally varying mean (KLVM) and found an increase of 3 tonnes which is within our uncertainty. A 20 by 20 m test plot was surveyed using ERT in 2009 and 2010. ERT results were regressed against chloride samples. ERT was transformed by the regression relationship. KLVM was used with chloride samples and transformed ERT and found a decrease of 32% in chloride mass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it