MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121576601 · doi:10.1002/jssc.200301561

Solid phase microextraction sampling and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for field detection of the chemical warfare agent <i>O</i>‐ethyl <i>S</i>‐(2‐diisopropylaminoethyl) methylphosphonothiolate (VX)

2003· article· en· W2121576601 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Gary L. Hook, Gregory Kimm, Geoffrey Betsinger, Paul B. Savage, Austin T. Swift, Tom Logan, Philip A. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Separation Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsSolid-phase microextractionChromatographyMass spectrometryChemistryGas chromatographyGas chromatography–mass spectrometryDetection limitChemical Warfare AgentsSample preparationPolydimethylsiloxaneFiberAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Organic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A rapid detection method for the chemical warfare nerve agent VX was developed using SPME and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Five commercially available SPME fiber coatings were evaluated to determine the optimal fiber coating and conditions for extraction. The use of silanized vials was found to be necessary to limit interaction of the basic tertiary amine component of VX with the acidic silanols present in standard glass vials. The polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) fiber was ultimately selected for completion of this work with extractions being performed at 50°C. Clothing material was spiked in the laboratory with 1 μL of neat VX, placed in a sealed vial, and taken into the field for SPME sampling, using optimized conditions studied. GC/MS analysis was also completed in the field using van‐mounted instrumentation. With sampling and analysis completed in less than 20.0 minutes, detection of VX contamination was relatively rapid, especially considering the quality of the resulting data. The use of SPME also provides increased safety for the field analysis of VX since it does not require the handling of solvents for sample preparation and samples are not handled directly by the analyst.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Separation ScienceSame topicPesticide Exposure and ToxicityFrench-language works237,207