MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121639747 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2010.5683759

Traffic Scheduling for Energy Sustainable Vehicular Infrastructure

2010· article· en· W2121639747 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulla A. Hammad, Ghada Badawy, T.D. Todd, Amir A. Sayegh, Dongmei Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)ProvisioningInteger programmingRenewable energyEnergy consumptionLinear programmingWireless ad hoc networkComputer networkDistributed computingMathematical optimizationWirelessTelecommunicationsEngineeringAlgorithmElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roadside infrastructure can be used provide a wide variety of commercial services in vehicular ad hoc networks. One particular challenge is that of providing roadside radio coverage in highway locations where wired electricity is not available. In this case, roadside access points (APs) powered by renewable energy such as solar power, is a viable alternative. The cost of provisioning this type of roadside infrastructure is dependent on the average power consumption of the AP, and can be reduced by energy efficient scheduling. In this paper, we consider the problem of satisfying vehicle communication requirements while minimizing the energy needed by the roadside access point. The problem is formulated as a Mixed Integer Linear Program (MILP) which provides an upper bound for the performance of any realizable scheduling algorithm. We then propose a Nearest Fastest Set (NFS) scheduler that uses vehicle location and velocity inputs to address the problem. Results from a variety of experiments show that the proposed scheduling algorithm performs well when compared to the performance bound.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207