MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121661753 · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65812-0

A MODIFIED BIOFEEDBACK PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN WITH DETRUSOR-SPHINCTER DYSSYNERGIA: 5-YEAR EXPERIENCE

2001· article· en· W2121661753 on OpenAlexaff
Lily Chin-Peuckert, João L. Pippi Salle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDyssynergiaDetrusor sphincter dyssynergiaBiofeedbackSphincterUrologyPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryNeurological disorderCentral nervous system disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: We reviewed our 5-year experience with a modified 4 to 6-session biofeedback program combining noninvasive urodynamic approaches with various psychological techniques, including externalizing the voiding problem, empowerment and praise, to treat children with detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biofeedback was performed with a urodynamics processor that enables simultaneous recording of urine flow and electromyography, and visual display of flow/electromyography activity. Initially normal and abnormal voiding were explained in a unique way and the children observed relaxation and contraction of the pelvic floor muscles while visualizing the electromyography monitor. The bladders were filled naturally and surface electrodes were placed. Psychological strategies were used to engage and motivate the children to achieve maximal cooperation. The children voided while attempting relaxation and post-void residual urine volume was measured by bladder scan. Special and specific praise was provided for progress and increasing self-esteem. Patients returned monthly to review these concepts and practice voiding. RESULTS: Of 87 children 77 completed the program, including 7 boys and 70 girls 3 to 17 years old (mean age 7.8) who required an average of 4.7 sessions (median 4). Results were achieved within 6 sessions in 82% of cases. Of the 77 children 59 (76%) had recurrent urinary tract infections, 38 (49%) had associated bladder instability, 19 (24%) had vesicoureteral reflux and 44 (58%) had constipation. Subjectively 47 patients (61%) reported pronounced improvement in urinary symptoms, while another 24 (32%) reported moderate improvement after biofeedback training. Objectively 47 children (61%) had normal flow with minimal electromyography activity during voiding and a normal post-void residual urine of less than 20% voided volume (p <0.002). In 28 cases (36%) flow studies improved (p <0.03) but post-void residual urine remained elevated. Vesicoureteral reflux resolved in 9 cases after biofeedback training. This approach was equally successful in children in all age groups. Those with more than a 2-year history of symptoms, poor bladder emptying and severe constipation had only moderate improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The modified biofeedback program including appropriate explanations and psychological approaches appeared effective for treating 92% of children with detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. It is less invasive and requires less time than traditional methods, and patients are more compliant with treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicPelvic floor disorders treatmentsFrench-language works237,207