MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121689879 · doi:10.1109/led.2005.851813

Modeling the partition of noise from the gate-tunneling current in MOSFETs

2005· article· en· W2121689879 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Electron Device Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)Time-dependent gate oxide breakdownGate oxideQuantum tunnellingAND gateMOSFETPhysicsFlicker noiseCurrent (fluid)Logic gateComputational physicsOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringNoise figureVoltageTransistorEngineeringComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Expressions for the spectral densities of the gate/source and gate/drain noise currents caused by current flow through the gate oxide of MOSFETs are derived. It is shown that these noise currents can also be expressed in terms of equivalent gate and drain noise currents, and by linearizing the position dependence of the gate current density, simple analytic expressions for these equivalent noise currents and their correlation are obtained in terms of the total gate current and the drain/source partition ratio. It is also shown that the predictions of this simple theory are consistent with published experimental data and results from numerical simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it