MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121694336 · doi:10.1179/026708300101508199

Flow curves up to peak strength of hot deformed D2 and W1 tool steels

2000· article· en· W2121694336 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Science and Technology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMetallurgyDynamic strain agingStrain rateCarbideCarbon steelAlloyFlow stressDuctility (Earth science)Torsion (gastropod)Work hardeningStrain hardening exponentAlloy steelActivation energyComposite materialMicrostructureCreepCorrosion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A high carbon, high chromium cold work die steel (D2) and a water hardenable carbon tool steel (W1) were hot deformed in torsion between 900 and 1150°C for the alloy steel and 900 and 1200°C for the carbon steel, at strain rates from 0·1 to 4 s -1 . The slope of the stress–strain curves, which represents strain hardening, decreased linearly then changed gradually to a slower linear decline before decreasing quickly to zero at the peak stress. On further strain, stress decreased to a steady state regime, indicative of dynamic recrystallisation. Kocks–Mecking analysis provided an activation enthalpy with an average comparable to the activation energy derived from a sinh modified Arrhenius analysis of peak stress. The alloy carbides of the D2 steel have the effect of raising its strength to over twice that of the carbon steel, accelerating the onset of dynamic recrystallisation but drastically lowering its ductility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it