MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121723563 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.39.5.1365

THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF NEYITE, Ag2Cu6Pb25Bi26S68

2001· article· en· W2121723563 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emil Makovicky, T. Balić-Žunić, Dan Topa

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCrystallographyCrystal structureMaterials scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structure of type neyite from Alice Arm, British Columbia, was determined from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data with the agreement factors R 1 = 0.037 (0.072 for all) and ω R 2 = 0.078. The structural formula supported by the new electron-microprobe data is AgCu 3 Pb 12.5 Bi 13 S 34 ( Z = 4); the lattice parameters are a 37.527(6), b 4.0705(6), c 43.701(7) A, β 108.801(2)°, space group C 2/m . The structure contains 26 independent large-cation polyhedra, one Ag site and three Cu sites. It can be described as an alternation of triple-octahedron (111) PbS -like layers with (100) PbS -like layers two atomic planes thick. Both sets of layers are (a) sheared, giving rise to tetrahedral Cu sites, and (b) truncated by wavy PbS-like layers (001) ney , three atomic planes thick. The resulting structure can be described as a box-work of (100) PbS -like layers enclosing (111) PbS -like fragments. Several hypothetical structures based on the neyite principle have been derived.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207