Problem formulation for path tracking automation of low speed articulated vehicles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper concerns the problem of path tracking control in the class of vehicles made up of two units with an articulation between the two. Each unit has two fixed (nonsteerable) wheels. Steering action is, thus, performed by changing the angle between the front and rear units. Such a vehicle is used for transfer of ore inside the relatively narrow and restricted underground mine galleries. The articulation in the middle helps also for better capability in curve negotiation. In operation, this vehicle usually moves with a low speed because of the environment. As a result, a number of issues, such as dynamic stability and aerodynamic forces which are important to road vehicles, do not come into effect. Furthermore, as far as the path tracking automation is concerned, the dynamics of the vehicle and tire deformation have little effect and can be neglected. Analysis and formulation of the path tracking problem, thus, can be based on the kinematics only. In this paper the control problem is formulated and verified. The synthesis of a feedback system to govern the steering action, then, becomes possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it