MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121736670 · doi:10.1145/2318836.2318840

An automatic control interface for network-accessible embedded instruments

2012· article· en· W2121736670 on OpenAlexafffund
G. Smecher, François Aubin, Elizabeth George, T. de Haan, J. E. Kennedy, M. Dobbs

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGBED Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExperimental Learning in Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanada Research ChairsMcGill UniversityCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsJSONPython (programming language)Computer scienceInterface (matter)User interfaceProgramming languageControl networkSource codeNetwork interfaceOperating systemEmbedded systemControl (management)SoftwareArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a metaprogrammed control interface and support library for network-accessible embedded systems. Together, this project permits functions written in standard C code to be exposed via a network interface expressed in JSON. In turn, this JSON interface mates with a Python library that provides a high-level, user-friendly, and expressive development environment. This control interface removes the need to explicitly code interactions at the Python and network layers. As a result, the volume of error-prone and redundant hand-written code (e.g. for error-checking and validation) is vastly reduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGBED ReviewSame topicExperimental Learning in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207