Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a technique for generating numerically an incident tapered beam of a prescribed polarization and a prescribed incidence angle by summing a finite number of propagating uniform plane waves, each constituent plane wave having its own magnitude, phase, incidence angle and polarization. Our three ad-hoc schemes for choosing the magnitude, the incidence angle and the polarization of a constituent plane wave are different from those by Braunisch et al. Our choice of the propagating plane waves corresponds to a sampling of the physical angular (/spl theta/, /spl phi/) space. This contrasts with the two-dimensional Fourier transform technique by Braunisch et al. and its Cartesian sampling of the (k/sub x/, k/sub y/) spectral plane where k/sub x/=(k/sub o/sin/spl theta/cos/spl phi/) and k/sub y/=(k/sub o/sin/spl theta/sin/spl phi/). Our technique is based on the summation of only propagating plane waves, whereas the technique by Braunisch et al. is based on the summation of both propagating and evanescent plane waves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".