MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P<scp>ROGRESS</scp> T<scp>OWARD</scp> U<scp>NDERSTANDING THE</scp> G<scp>ENETIC AND</scp> B<scp>IOCHEMICAL</scp> M<scp>ECHANISMS OF</scp> I<scp>NHERITED</scp> P<scp>HOTORECEPTOR</scp> D<scp>EGENERATIONS</scp>

2003· review· en· W2121750285 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Review of Neuroscience · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Eye Institute
KeywordsRNA splicingGeneCell biologyBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More than 80 genes associated with human photoreceptor degenerations have been identified. Attention must now turn toward defining the mechanisms that lead to photoreceptor death, which occurs years to decades after the birth of the cells. Consequently, this review focuses on topics that offer insights into such mechanisms, including the one-hit or constant risk model of photoreceptor death; topological patterns of photoreceptor degeneration; mutations in ubiquitously expressed splicing factor genes associated only with photoreceptor degeneration; disorders of the retinal pigment epithelium; modifier genes; and global gene expression analysis of the retina, which will greatly increase our understanding of the downstream events that occur in response to a mutation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.092
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.092
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0090.008
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.006
Bibliometrics0.0030.011
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0120.005
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it