Interfacial Enzymology of Parvovirus Phospholipases A2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The capsid of parvoviruses proteins were recently shown to contain secreted phospholipase A(2) (sPLA(2))-like activity that is required during host cell entry. Parvoviral PLA(2) domains have little sequence identity with sPLA(2)s and lack disulfide bonds. In the present study, after bacterial expression and purification, the biochemical characterizations of these first PLA(2)s identified in viruses have been investigated, and a comparison has been made with other known PLA(2)s. The specific activities of three viral PLA(2)s differed by 3 orders of magnitude, with porcine parvovirus PLA(2) displaying a specific activity similar to that of the most active sPLA(2)s (e.g. human group IIA) and the human AAV2 and B19 parvoviral enzymes displaying approximately 10(3) lower specific activities (similar to human sPLA(2) groups IIE and XIIA). These differences were not caused by weaker Ca(2+) or interfacial binding. The specific activities of the viral PLA(2)s on zwitterionic or anionic phospholipid vesicles were comparable. The viral PLA(2)s did not display a preference for unsaturated versus saturated sn-2 fatty acyl chains and hydrolyzed all major classes of glycero-phospholipids except phosphatidylinositol. Incubation of mammalian cells with porcine parvovirus PLA(2) led to the release of arachidonic acid into the culture medium. Interestingly, among nine previously known sPLA(2) inhibitors, only a subset showed inhibition of the viral PLA(2)s and with weak potency, indicating that the active sites of these new enzymes are structurally distinct from those of sPLA(2)s. Based on these distinct enzymatic and structural properties, we propose to classify the parvovirus PLA(2)s within the PLA(2) superfamily as group XIII enzymes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".