MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121804654 · doi:10.1080/03067310310001638320

Analytical method development of long-chain ketones in PM<sub>2.5</sub>aerosols using accelerated solvent extraction and Gc/FID/MSD

2004· article· en· W2121804654 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Cheng, Shao‐Meng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromatographyChemistryBoiler blowdownGas chromatographyFlame ionization detectorExtraction (chemistry)SolventSilica gelAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Organic chemistryInlet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical method has been developed to determine long-chain n-alkan-2-ones (C10–C33) in atmospheric particulate matter. This involves (1) solvent extraction with a Dionex Accelerated Solvent Extractor (ASE 200), followed by nitrogen blowdown; (2) a clean-up procedure using silica-gel chromatography to separate fractions of different polarities; and (3) gas chromatography with mass-selective detector (GC/MSD) identification and gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC/FID) quantitation. The recovery rates in the extraction/blowdown steps were quantified at different extraction and blowdown temperatures. The maximum recoveries for the selected ketones, obtained at 40°C for both extraction and blowdown, are 70–100% for the extraction step and 92–101% for the combined steps of blowdown and silica gel separation depending on the chain length of the ketones. The overall analytical instrumental detection limits for the ketones are <0.24 ng/µL in the GC/FID.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environmental & Analytical ChemistrySame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207