MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121814445 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2008.4649855

Improved interactive medical image segmentation using Enhanced Intelligent Scissors (EIS)

2008· article· en· W2121814445 on OpenAlexaff
Akshaya Mishra, Alexander Wong, Wen Zhang, David A. Clausi, Paul Fieguth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSegmentationArtificial intelligenceImage segmentationPruningBoundary (topology)Computer visionMarket segmentationTracingViterbi algorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Hidden Markov modelMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel interactive approach called Enhanced Intelligent Scissors (EIS) is presented for segmenting regions of interest in medical images. The proposed interactive medical image segmentation algorithm addresses the issues associated with segmenting medical images and allows for fast, robust, and flexible segmentation without requiring accurate manual tracing. A robust complex wavelet phase-based representation is used as an external local cost to address issues associated with contrast non-uniformities and noise typically found in medical images. The boundary extraction problem is formulated as a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) and the novel approach to the second-order Viterbi algorithm with state pruning is used to find the optimal boundary in a robust and efficient manner based on the extracted external and internal local costs, thus handling much inexact user boundary definitions than existing methods. Experimental results using MR and CT images show that the proposed algorithm achieves accurate segmentation in medical images without the need for accurate boundary definition as per existing Intelligent Scissors methods. Furthermore, usability testing indicate that the proposed algorithm requires significantly less user interaction than Intelligent Scissors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207