MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121820347 · doi:10.5339/qfarf.2013.biosp-05

Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Screening Practices Among Arabic Women Living in the State of Qatar: The Health Care Providers' Perspective

2013· article· en· W2121820347 on OpenAlexaff
Jasmine Hwang

Bibliographic record

VenueQatar Foundation Annual Research Forum Volume 2013 Issue 1 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careBreast cancerMedicineFamily medicineQualitative researchBreast cancer screeningNursingPsychologyGerontologyCancerMammographySociologyPolitical scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer contributing to morbidity and mortality among Arabic women in Qatar. Arabic women are at risk primarily due to their low participation rates in breast cancer screening practices and subsequent delayed diagnosis of the disease. Therefore, there must be a strong emphasis on the health care providers and the health care system to increase efforts in early detection of breast cancer. METHODS: This Master's thesis study is a part of a larger, mixed methods study entitled "Factors Influence Breast Cancer Screening Practices Amongst Arabic Women Living in the State of Qatar" conducted by Dr. Tam Truong Donnelly, the lead principal investigator, and funded by the Qatar National Research Fund under the National Priorities Research Program. Following the theoretical frameworks of the main research study, this qualitative research based its theoretical foundation on an ecological perspective and Kleinman's explanatory model to explore, understand, and describe factors influencing Arabic women's breast cancer screening practices from the health care providers' perspective. Using Carspecken's critical ethnography, fifteen health care providers from three health care sites who work at various levels of the health care system in Qatar were interviewed individually and face to face. RESULTS: An analysis of the data revealed factors that either hinder or facilitate women's breast health and health care practices in Qatar. The influences of the factors are coalesced into four major themes: influences of (a) knowledge and awareness, pain associated with mammogram, and perception of 'no pain, no illness', (b) cultural beliefs, attitudes, and practices with regard to female breasts, body, illness, and unhealthy women and religious beliefs regarding modesty, health, and illness (c) unequal gender relations of power, female roles and responsibilities, and spousal support, and (d) systemic (health care and social resource) factors on women's breast cancer screening practices. CONCLUSIONS: As with many women worldwide, the study findings suggest that Arabic women's health cannot be understood in isolation from the environment in which they live. Rather, the health of Arabic women in Qatar is both constrained and fostered by health care and social systems that are embedded in culture. Addressing problems on a personal level isolated from the context will not be adequate and effective. Therefore, what seems immediately personal must be examined within its context; solutions need to address the context and not be limited to the individual. Authors offer implications for the health care, health care professionals, education, and research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQatar Foundation Annual Research Forum Volume 2013 Issue 1Same topicGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningFrench-language works237,207