MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121827080

Economic Consequences of Alternative Exchange Rate and Monetary Policy Regimes in Canada

2005· article· en· W2121827080 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tiff Macklem, Patrick N. Osakwe, Hope Pioro, Lawrence Schembri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsExchange rateWelfareMonetary policyVolatility (finance)Monetary economicsConsumption (sociology)Fixed exchange ratesGeneral equilibrium theoryExchange-rate regimeFloating exchange rateEconometricsMacroeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper uses a stochastic Dynamic General Equilibrium Model to analyze the economic and welfare consequences for Canada of two alternative exchange rate and monetary policy rules: a flexible exchange rate regime with a price-level target and a permanently fixed exchange rate regime, which might occur with the formation of a North American monetary union. The model is calibrated to Canadian data and then simulated to determine the impact of term-of-trade shocks on key macroeconomic variables under the two regimes. The main finding of the paper is that employment, output, and consumption are much more volatile under a fixed exchange rate. Because agents are risk-averse, this volatility has significant welfare costs. The study also shows that transactions costs would have to be implausibly high and agents almost risk neutral for the welfare advantage of a flexible exchange rate to disappear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactFrench-language works237,207