MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121845748 · doi:10.1080/13693780500411097

Isolated endogenous endophthalmitis due to a sporodochial-forming<i>Phialemonium curvatum</i>acquired through intracavernous autoinjections

2005· article· en· W2121845748 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Miriam Weinberger, I. Mahrshak, Nathan Keller, A. Goldscmied-Reuven, N. Amariglio, Michal Kramer, Ana Tobar, Zemira Samra, Silvio Pitlik, Michael G. Rinaldi, Elizabeth H. Thompson, Deanna A. Sutton

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Mycology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsEnucleationEndophthalmitisAcremoniumMicrobiologyMedicineBiologyDermatologyOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a case of endogenous endophthalmitis due to a sporodochial-forming species of Phialemonium curvatum. The infection led to the enucleation of the affected eye, but there was no evidence of systemic dissemination. The isolated P. curvatum produced aggregates of phialides, many occurring on coils or in verticils, which eventually develop into sporodochia. The initial and post-enucleation isolates revealed they were identical to strains of P. curvatum from Israel causing disseminated disease in patients practicing intracavernous autoinjections for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. The reported case had unusual clinical and microbiological features. Despite the route of acquisition and the lack of systemic antifungal therapy, the infection did not spread beyond the eye. The morphology of the phialides aggregates was also unique, and the distinction between Volutella and Acremonium is discussed. This case expands the spectrum of infections due to Phialemonium species, and reveals a novel way of developing fungal endophthalmitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical MycologySame topicOcular Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207