Male sexual function after autologous blood or marrow transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although endocrine dysfunction has been reported in survivors of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT), data for autologous BMT (autoBMT) recipients are lacking. Because information on male potency in particular is scanty, we prospectively assessed male sexual function after autoBMT. We identified 16 men who were < or =50 years of age at the time of evaluation and disease free for at least 6 months after autoBMT. Nine had Hodgkin's disease, 4 had acute myelogenous leukemia, and 3 had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood samples were assayed for luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone. Patients were surveyed with a modified version of the Pyschosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale regarding erectile dysfunction and loss of interest in sexual activities. Seventy five percent of the men reported normal interest in sexual activities and 87.5% reported normal erectile function; however, 4 of 16 reported a moderate loss of interest in sexual activities, and another 2 of 16 reported frequent loss of erectile function. All 4 men with decreased libido and both men with impaired erectile function had Hodgkin's disease. Fourteen (88%) of 16 patients had an elevated FSH level, 7 (47%) of 15 had elevated LH, and 6 (38%) of 16 had decreased testosterone levels. Decreased testosterone levels correlated with a moderate or total loss of libido (P = .008) and a diagnosis of Hodgkin's disease (P = .01). Thus, after transplantation, most men have abnormal levels of gonadotrophins. Decreased levels of testosterone and symptoms of sexual dysfunction correlated with a diagnosis of Hodgkin's disease and may be related to the induction and salvage therapy received prior to autoBMT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".