Prevalence of TMJ disc displacement in a pre-orthodontic adolescent sample.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study evaluated the prevalence of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement in preorthodontic adolescents (75 boys, 119 girls) by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). One hundred thirty-eight consecutive subjects were recruited regardless of TMJ signs or symptoms, whereas 56 other subjects were referred with associated signs or symptoms. Quantitative measurements of disc displacement and disc length were used to classify the degree of internal derangement into 6 categories on the basis of sagittal MRI slices of the joints. In addition, sideways disc displacement was determined from coronal MRI images of the joint. Unilateral and bilateral normal disc position was more prevalent in boys compared to girls. All forms of anterior and rotational disc displacement were more prevalent in the female sample than in the male. Sideways displacement was more prevalent in girls than boys and occurred more frequently in a lateral rather than a medial direction. This study supports previous studies in suggesting that disc displacements occur frequently in preorthodontic adolescents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".