MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2121893425 · doi:10.1094/pdis-91-6-0767a

First Report of Leaf Spot Caused by <i>Alternaria alternata</i> on <i>Hydrangea macrophylla</i> in Italy

2007· article· en· W2121893425 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Garibaldi, G. Gilardi, S. Frati, M. L. Gullino

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFungal Plant Pathogen Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySpotsLeaf spotConidiumMyceliumPotato dextrose agarOrnamental plantBotanyAlternariaAlternaria alternataChlorosisHorticulturePEARAgar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrangea macrophylla is cultivated as an ornamental and also used in the landscape. During the fall of 2005, leaves and young stems on 12-month-old plants (cvs. Hanabi, Nigra, and Zaffiro) grown in pots in several gardens and commercial nurseries in the Piedmont (northern Italy) had extensive necrosis. In many cases, 4-mm-diameter spots on the upper side of the leaves were surrounded by a chlorotic halo, which turned progressively black. Lesions often coalesced into 3- to 8-cm-diameter necrotic areas. Initial necrosis developed mainly on the leaf margins and near the petioles. Severely affected plants were defoliated. Infected plants rarely died, but the presence of lesions reduced the aesthetic quality and subsequently the commercial value. The disease occurred on 30 to 50% of the plants. Leaf spots contained dark brown, multicellular, pear-shaped conidia. Conidia were 19.2 to 36.5 μm (average 26.3 μm) long and 7.7 to 11.5 μm (average 8.9 μm) wide, with 3 to 4 longitudinal cross walls and an average of 4.4 single cells. A fungus identified on the basis of its morphological characteristics as an Alternaria sp. was consistently isolated from symptomatic leaves onto potato dextrose agar. DNA was extracted from mycelium (Nucleospin Plant Kit, Macherey Nagel, Brockville, ON, Canada) and PCR was completed using Alt-for/Alt-rev primers (3), which amplified a part of the gene that encodes for the protein Alt a 1, the major allergen produced by the genus Alternaria. A 305-bp fragment was amplified, sequenced, and the sequence was subjected to BLASTn analysis (1), which confirmed that the isolate belonged to the genus Alternaria and to the alternata group (3). The nucleotide sequence has been deposited in GenBank (Accession No. EF446670). Pathogenicity tests were performed by spraying leaves of healthy potted H. macrophylla plants, cvs. Zaffiro (6-month-old) and Hanabi (12-month-old) with a spore suspension (10 5 conidia/ml). Plants sprayed with water only served as a control. Ten plants per cultivar were used for each treatment. Plants were covered with plastic bags for 5 days after inoculation and maintained at 20°C for an additional 7 days. Plants were transferred outdoors and kept at temperatures ranging from 19 to 25°C. The first foliar lesions developed on leaves 15 days after inoculation, whereas control plants remained healthy. Alternaria sp. was consistently reisolated from these lesions. The pathogenicity test was completed twice. The presence of Alternaria sp. on Hydrangea spp. was reported in the United States (2), whereas A. hortensiae was observed in Spain (4). To our knowledge, this is the first report of Alternaria sp. belonging to the alternata group infecting H. macrophylla in Italy. The disease is currently spreading in other Italian areas. References: (1) S. F. Altschud et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389, 1997. (2) M. L. Daughtrey et al. Page 9 in: Compendium of Flowering Potted Plant Diseases. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, 1995. (3) S. Gyu Hong et al. Fungal Genet. Biol. 42:119, 2005. (4) L. M. Unamuno. An. Jard. Bot. Madr. 4:145, 1944.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFrench-language works237,207